Tonight I will introduce you to one of the concepts that led to the loss of my faith.
I'm sorry, but I don't think I'll be able to make a very coherent story of my life. I'm probably just going to post shorter thoughts, which together make up the larger theme of me. That's the idea of a blog, right?
I also want to clarify that this is not going to be a "oh pity me, my life is so sad" kind of blog. Don't worry. I know it was going there on my last post. I apologize. I'll apologize this time, but now I'm done apologizing for it.
The basic premise is this: as a Christian, you're taught that Christianity is truth, and everything else is darkness. "Obviously", you might say. Well, what I'm saying is that I was convinced that Christianity was the "default" religion. If there is a God, it is the Christian God. If you want to seek truth, you go to him. Furthermore, every human knows this, innately! It's a universal default. If you are something other than a Christian, you haven't really chosen something else, you've rejected Christianity and its God, and that is how you are defined. Therefore, it is fair to send every non-Christian in the world to Hell, because they knew the truth, and rejected it.
What I started to realize was that I basically only believed that way because it was brainwashed into me growing up. I went to Sunday school, where you are told, it IS this way. It's a fact. A child's mind is very malleable; I remember that if my mom or dad told me something, it was truth. Bob Dole WAS better than Bill Clinton, end of story, my parents told me so. Evolution was a hoax, my uncle told me so. So, of course this religion was close to my heart and embedded in my thoughts, and I believed it was the universal default.
(Now I wish to make the distinction that my whole faith wasn't based on this brainwashing. No, I chose to pursue it for myself once I came of age. I thought about it and I decided it was my own. I learned about it for myself and pursued this "relationship" with God. It was my whole life. I would have taken a bullet rather than deny it, because the concept of heaven was so real to me that I viewed my life on Earth as just one blink compared to eternity in heaven. I wanted to be a missionary in China or N Korea or Southeast Asia or...)
Anyway, I started to think about this question: what if I had been born in Saudi Arabia? Or, China? Or, India? To Muslim, or atheist, or Hindu parents? My reality and defaults would have been totally different. The conclusion that you have to trust in Jesus to get to heaven would have seemed totally absurd. Maybe I never would have heard of him. I could have been a dedicated Muslim, maybe even a suicide bomber. I understand that kind of zeal.
That's why Christians feel (in theory) that missions work is so important... if people aren't exposed to Jesus's story, they're going to Hell. It just doesn't make any sense to me. No amount of Bible reading and sermons and lectures could cause this to make sense to me. Why would God create a race where we're automatically going to Hell unless we get saved? Why would he base an eternity of blessing or punishment on the actions we take in a few years here, when we don't all have the same opportunity to hear about him? Why would we all inherit a sinful nature just because Adam and Eve sinned? Why did he even let them fall away from him?
The standard response is, "God let mankind have a choice because he loved us. We had to have the choice to follow him or not, otherwise we'd be like mindless robots serving him, and that's not real freedom and love." Well, if God made the universe, and love, then why did he have to give mankind that choice? Was he bound by the rules of love, before he created love?
What do you think is the "saved" rate all throughout the history of humanity? 5%? Why would God see any beauty or justice in creating a world where 95% of people will not know him, and then be condemned to torture forever?
I am tired of hearing from Christians who "know" that their way is correct. Bullshit, you don't know it. You "know" it the same way that militant Muslims "know" that they must carry out jihad. Do you think they believe it any less than you believe what you do? Lots of people have the illusion of absolute knowledge. I'm not one of them.
What has become apparent to me is that "default" or "neutral" is simply to have no faith in any god or religion. Isn't it just obvious? Christians would have me believe that believing in no god is not neutral, but a choice against the true God, a rejection of truth. Look, the day that God wants to actually do something that evidences his existence, I will be more than happy to reconsider. And according to everything I believed, God is constantly working in my heart to draw me to him, but I have NEVER felt it, even when begging and crying for him on my knees in a ditch. Until then, what reason should I have for believing in it? All I have to go off is my own experience. Every religion has its strong believers, its holy books, its geographical region of majority, so I don't find those things to be very convincing factors.
This post is long, and rough, but I'm not sorry. If you can't read it all, that's your problem. You should try to understand what I'm saying, because it's important. Thanks for taking the time to listen to me; I look forward to hearing from you.
-0
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Unfortunately, we live in a very anti-reason altrusitic (i.e. self-sacrificing) society that makes rational values difficult to achieve. Faith, believing in something where no perceptual evidence exists, is a major part of the problem. I didn't become an atheist until the age of 22, but by my mid teens I should have been able to figure out there's no all-knowing being controling or watching me (God) and that I have complete free will. Our irrational culture, and religion, definitely stunts rational thinking.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I'd recommend reading "The Fountnainhead" by Ayn Rand. It's a novel about an idealistic architect striving to achieve his rationally selfish values in a society that holds sacrifice as a virtue. Basically it says that by acting in your own long term self interest and placing your happiness as the most important thing in your life, you will, as a secondary benefit and corollary, be of the most benefit to society, because by thinking independently you will produce great things.
The novel was the impetus that started my major intellectual shift towards becoming an atheist and understanding reality.
Thanks for your comment. I first heard about that book through the album by Spiral Architect, "A Sceptic's Universe". There is a song called Fountainhead on it. I will read it someday.
ReplyDeleteInterestingly, in Christianity there is a similar view... the main proponent of it that I have seen is John Piper, and he describes himself as a "Christian Hedonist". The idea is that God is best served by us fully enjoying him and our relationship with him. That our enjoyment of him/life is our first purpose, and that all other benefits come after that.
Naturally the problem with that is that it's pretty damn hard to enjoy a God who you can't talk to, hear from, see, feel, or anything. Seems like it would take a pretty strong imagination to feel that much enjoyment in Christian Hedonism.
Thanks for your comment, I'll be checking your blog.
-0
Great post! I think a lot of the ideas and thoughts you expertly covered here are, from my estimation, pretty common. Honestly, it's hard to argue those points. Christianity is pretty cultural, which is why I'm amazed at anyone who finds faith or a new religion when they are adults.
ReplyDeleteI still believe God is to be experienced more than anything, and it's not about do's and donts. I think the only thing that holds me into this somewhat insane sounding faith is because of things that have happened to me that I can't explain. I can't explain why you haven't had those experiences, but I feel like they are a lot more common than what we've been taught. The last great one for me was at Lake Michigan near my home about a month ago. Pretty transformational for me.
It's that whole thick heavy line between the holy and the secular, which to me is a lot more blurry and thin than Christians would like it to be. There's comfort in certainty. You take the mystery out of God and you have...a vending machine? Painting an infinite God with thick, heavy strokes...*sigh*
I have that Piper book about Christian Hedonism. I might read it, probably won't though. ;-)
Anyway, I promised no proselytizing. I hope I didn't do that, but it's a force of habit. Thanks for listening!
d*